Anna University Examination Rules , Nature of Malpractice and Punishment Details

2
Anna University Logo
Anna University , Chennai
RULES OF THE EXAMINATIONS
  • A candidate is permitted to use geometric tools, non-programmable calculators and approved tables and data books during the theory and the practical examinations. No other material/gadget (including cell phone) should be brought inside the examination hall.
  • A candidate should neither poses/refer any forbidden material in any form nor should seek/obtain assistance in any form from any person/source towards answering the questions during the examinations.
  • He/she should not assist other candidates in any form towards answering the questions during the examinations.
  • The candidate should not reveal his/her identity in any form in the answer scripts.
  • The candidate should not indulge in canvasing either directly or indirectly to award more than deserving marks in the examinations.
  • The candidate should maintain discipline and decorum during the examinations.
Violation of the above rules in any form during the examinations will attract punishment ranging from levying fine to permanently debarring the candidate from continuing his/her studies as given below.

Sl. No.Nature of Malpractice
1Appeal by the candidate in the answer script to show mercy by way of awarding more than deserving marks.Fine of Rs. 100/- per subject.
2The candidate writing his/her name in the answer script.
3The candidate writing his/her registration number/college name in places other than specified in the answer script.
4Any special marking in the answer script by the candidate.
5 The candidate communicating with neighboring candidate orally or non-verbally; the candidate causing suspicious movement of his/her body.
6 Irrelevant writing by the candidate in the answer script.
7The candidate marking on the question paper or writing answer on his/her question paper or making use of his/her question paper for rough work.
8The candidate possessing cell phones/programmable calculator(s)/any other electronic storage device(s) containing no incriminating materials.
9The candidate facilitating the other candidate(s) to copy from his/her answer script.
10The candidate possessing any incriminating material(s) (whether used or not). For example:- Written or printed materials, bits of papers containing written information, writings on scale, calculator, handkerchief, dress, part of the body, Hal Ticket etc.
11 The candidate possessing cell phone(s)/programmable calculator(s)/any other electronic storage device(s) and containing incriminating materials (whether used or not).
12The candidate possessing the question paper of another candidate with additional writing on it.
13The candidate passing his/her question paper to another candidate with additional writing on it
14 The candidate passing incriminating materials brought into the examination hall in any medium (hard/soft) to other candidate(s).
15 The candidate copying from neighboring candidate.
16 Vulgar/offensive writings by the candidate in the answer script. Invalidating the examinations of al the theory and practical subjects of the current semester and all the arrears- subjects registered by the candidate.
17The candidate possessing the answer script of another candidate.
18 The candidate passing his/her answers script to another candidate.
19 Appeal by the candidate in the answer script coupled with a promise of any form of consideration
20 The candidate misbehaving in the examination hall.
21 Involved in any one or more of the malpractices of serial no. 10 to 19 for the second or subsequent times.
22Cases of Impersonation
A) Handing over the impersonator to the police with a complaint to take appropriate action against the person involved in the impersonation by the Chief Supt.
B) If a student of this University is found to impersonate a ‘bonafide student’, the impersonating student is debarred from continuing his/her studies and writing the examinations permanently. He/she is not eligible for any further admission to any programme of the University.
C) Debarring the ‘bonafide student’ for whom the impersonation was done from continuing his/her studies and writing the examinations permanently. He/she is not eligible for any further admission to any programme of the University.

Punishments:
Fine of Rs. 1000/- per subject. for 1 to 7

Fine of Rs. 2000/- per subject. for 8

Invalidating the examination of the particular subject written by the candidate. for 9

Invalidating the examinations of the subject concerned and all the theory and the practical subjects of the current semester registered by the candidate. Further the candidate is not considered for revaluation of answer scripts of the arrears-subjects.
If the candidate has registered for arrears-subjects only, invalidating the examinations of al the arrears-subjects registered by the candidate for 10 to 15

Invalidating the examinations of all the theory and practical subjects of the current semester and all the arrears- subjects registered by the candidate. for 16 to 19

Invalidating the examinations of all the theory and practical subjects of the current semester and all the arrear- subjects registered by the candidate;
additional punishment:
(i) if the candidate has not completed the programme, he/she is debarred from continuing his/her studies for one year i.e., for two subsequent semesters. However the student is permitted to appear for the examination in all the arrears-subjects up to the last semester during the debarred period. 
(ii) if the candidate has completed the programme, he/she is prevented from writing the examinations of the arrears- subjects for two subsequent semesters. for 20 and 21
Nice Share bro.. Sign0098 +3 Reputed
New Share your Study Materials with us : Click Here
old or newly updated rules......???